TI s calculations are open to challenge. Do Amazon, Google and Berkshire Hathawaydeserve to be ranked near the bottom? Probably not. These firms may not disclose asmuch as TI would like, but they are not in businesses where one is ever asked to bribe acabinet minister to win a mining concession. TI does a good job of focusing attention on aserious problem. But like The Economist s adultery survey, its results should be taken with ahandful of salt.
透明国际的计算标准令人质疑的。亚马逊、谷歌以及伯克希尔?哈撒韦,这些公司都该排名垫底吗?可能不该。这些公司或许不会如透明国际希望的那样,披露自己的信息,但是,它们也不在那些 腐败高发 行业中,在那些行业中,人们总会被要求着,为赢得开采特权,而去向内阁总理行贿。透明国际在将注意力集中在严重的问题这方面,做得很好。但是就像是《经济学家》的通奸调查,它的结论不能全信。
【2015考研英语阅读公司透明度】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30