来自印第安纳经济发展公司的证据表明很多雇主确实需要这样的法律。该公司说,在印州1/4到1/2计划搬迁的公司中,某公司坚持要将其公司所在地搬到通过了RTW的州中。
Few companies, though, are willing to go on the record to say exactly why they prefer tolocate in RTW states though the reason is pretty obviousin a nutshell, they make forweaker unions. It is a sensitive subject and companies fear picketing and other similarreprisals. However, Remy International, an electrical-engineering company based inPendleton, Indiana, has stated that it plans to build another factory in America some timenext year: but that in the absence of RTW legislation it will not build it in Indiana.
然而至于准确说出为什么他们更愿意搬迁到通过了RTW的州,虽然理由显而易见---简言之,他们这样做,是为了弱化工会---没有公司愿意始作俑者。这是一个敏感话题,公司也不敢越雷池,害怕遭到类似的报复。然而,位于该州彭德尔顿的电工程公司雷米国际已经声明,该公司计划在明年某个时间国内在建一座工厂:但为了逃避RTW法案,该公司不会将新厂建在印州。
In an interview with Stateline, a news service that looks at trends in state policy, a vice-president of Remy, Jay Pittas, argued that RTW legislation makes it easier to negotiateflexible work rules, and means that unions are more likely to agree to a merit-based systemof employment rather than a one based on seniority. The company, however, now declines tocomment further on the subject.
【2015考研英语阅读工作权利法案】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30