Louboutin反驳道如可能认可几种颜色搭配在一起的商标,比如古琦的条纹图案,也应该认可单一颜色的商标。另外公司还坚持一点,Christian Louboutin是将红底运用到高跟鞋设计中的第一人。不过它的对手却表示并非如此。伊夫圣罗兰宣称早在十八世纪法国国王路易十四就拥有一双红跟舞鞋,多萝西也曾在电影《绿野仙踪》里穿着一双深红色的拖鞋翩翩起舞。
The judge has made up his mind that no fashion designer should be allowed a monopoly oncolour because as artists they all need to be able to use the full palette. To make this point, heimagined Picasso taking Monet to court over the use of blue in his painting of water lilies,because it was the same or close to the distinctive shade of indigo, the colour ofmelancholy he used in his Blue Period. Moreover, unlike patent law, trademarks are neverabout granting monopolies, argues David Bernstein, a lawyer for YSL at Debevoise andPlimpton. Trademarks are merely the right to indicate the origin of a product or service.
法官似乎心意已决,他坚持认为时装设计师不可以用颜色来做专利,因为艺术家们要能利用调色板里的每一种颜色。为了说明这一点,他甚至做出一个假设:毕加索向莫奈宣称要将其告上法庭,因为莫奈在作品睡莲里使用了蓝色,这种蓝色和靛蓝色一样,或者相近,而靛蓝色正是毕加索的画作《忧郁的时光》里用来增加忧郁色彩的颜色。而且商标权与专利法不同,商标权从来和认可专利权没什么关系,伊夫圣罗兰的代理律师DavidBernstein如是说道。所以商标权仅仅只是一权利,用来认定某种产品或机构的来源。
【2015考研英语阅读红底鞋之争】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30