Susan Scafidi of Fordham University School of Law in New York says that the judge sidesteppedthe important question by boiling the argument down to aesthetic functionality. The truechallenge of the case, says Ms Scafidi, is to determine when the use of colour on a portion ofapparel is a design element and when it is a trademark. It will now be the job of an appealcourt to rule on the matter. And if Louboutin loses again, the company says it will take its caseall the way to the Supreme Court.
来自纽约福德姆法学院的Susan Scafidi表示,这位法官将这场争论归结到一个美观功能的问题上,实际上回避了很重要的一点。Susan Scafidi说这个案子真正的挑战是要确定红色是在何时作为一种设计元素出现在高跟鞋上,又是在何时红色成为一种商标的。这才应该是上诉法庭在决断这个案子时应该做的工作。如果Louboutin再次败诉,公司表示不会就此罢休,无论如何也要上诉到最高法院。
【2015考研英语阅读红底鞋之争】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30