在私下里,政府官员们在很长时间里已经对这一工程表示过担心,他们的怀疑偶尔会在官方媒体上抛头露面。但政府自身并没有承认。1992年的国家会议上,当三峡工程未经审核就被批准时,正值3年前天安门事件发生不久,反对声音被当时压抑的政治氛围所笼罩。上个7 月,随着大坝面临06年竣工以来的一次最大的洪水,政府官员暗示,他们可能高估了三峡防洪的能力。5月18号,干旱再一次使三峡成为热点,在温家宝主持的政府会议上,进一步承认其存在弊端。
Having called the dam hugely beneficial overall,the cabinets statement said there were problemsrelating to the resettlement of 1.4m people, to theenvironment and to the prevention of geologicaldisasters that urgently needed addressing. Thedam, it said, had had a certain impact onnavigation, irrigation and water-supplydownstream. Some of these problems had beenforecast at the design stage or spotted duringconstruction. But they had been difficult toresolve effectively because of limitations imposedby conditions at the time. It did not elaborate.
曾今一度声称大坝利益无穷,小组人员表示有关一千四百万群众的安置、环境和防止地质灾害等问题都急需处理。据说大坝必然对航运、灌溉和下游水源补给产生影响。其中一些问题在设计阶段已被暴露或者在施工阶段被警告。但是因为当时现实条件的限制而很难有效解决三峡工程并不周密。
【2015考研英语阅读阻塞的三峡】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30