美国网上零售商以及 云计算服务的供应商亚马逊的其中一个巨型服务器场也经历了漫长的故障。这一服务器场的存储器和处理设备被用来租借给其它公司。尽管两起事故并无关联且本质不同,但人们不禁要问,我们能真的能相信云背后的基本理念吗?我们从互联网购买计算服务就像从公用事业单位购买煤气或水那样?
Sony s security breach is particularly embarrassingbecause it wants to position its PlayStation consoleas an entertainment hub capable of delivering filmsand music over the internet, in addition to videogames. An entertainment one-stop-shop of thisnature will appeal to consumers only if it is secureand reliable; a DVD, after all, does not suddenlyrefuse to play for a week. Sony also failed to encryptsome of the personal details of its customers-anelementary error for a company that prides itself onits technological prowess. In Amazon s case, theproblems were caused by a glitch that took longer than expected to resolve, affecting theoperations of several internet firms thatuse its services, and denting the reputations of all concerned-as well as that of the cloud itself.
安全漏洞让索尼陷入相当尴尬的境地因为索尼希望将PlayStation游戏机定位为能够通过互联网提供电影和音乐的娱乐中心,而不仅仅是电子游戏。只有足够安全且值得信赖,这种性质的一站式娱乐才能吸引用户。毕竟,仅仅是DVD的话,不会突然被关闭一周。在加密其用户个人资料方面索尼也是失败的对于一个标榜其技术实力的公司而言,这是一个基本的失误。在亚马逊的案例中,问题是由一个小故障造成的,解决这一问题耗时比预期要长,影响了一些互联网公司的运营,对所有相关方的名誉都产生了不利影响云本身也概莫能外。
【2015考研英语阅读云计算的发轫之困】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30