Anything that makes digital downloading more appealing should be good news for the recordlabels. They should also welcome strong competition for Apple, which has held sway overdigital music for a decade. On the other hand, collapsing CD purchases are making themdesperate for new sources of revenue. If there is going to be money in digital-locker services,they want a cut. Some have stayed quiet about Amazons move so far because they regard itas the foundation of a more ambitious music service that will provide new revenues for them.It may be, for example, that consumers will be offered the chance to listen to each othersmusic for a fee.
无论哪种方式,只要能让数字音乐下载更吸引人,对唱片公司而言都是喜讯。它们也会欢迎针对苹果的激烈竞争,后者左右数字音乐市场已达十年。另一方面,CD销量急剧减少,唱片公司亟需新收入来源。倘若媒体数字寄存柜服务有利可图,它们也想分一杯羹。对亚马逊的举动,有些唱片公司至今默不做声,概因其认为,那是一项更具雄心音乐服务的基础,会增加收入。这种服务,打个比方,或许是消费者有机会付费收听彼此收藏的音乐。
If the record companies are understandably torn about how to respond to a new distributionmodel, the television firms are simply wrong. It is hard to imagine a less disruptive innovationthan TWCs iPad app. By letting people who have already paid for a programme watch it onanother screen, the app raises the value of a television subscription and strengthens the pay-TV ecosystem on which media firms depend. They may win their fight, but it might have beenbetter not to enter the ring.
【2015考研英语阅读网络媒体分销】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30