(III)Somewhat surprisingly,Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization.Specifically,managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision-making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
(IV)Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture.They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision-making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision-making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations,decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms.The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
(V)In the not-for-profit organizations,decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents.Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
这种结构分析法可以分两步走:段与段之间的关系;段内内容构成的关系(句与句之间)。
第一步:注意段与段之间的连接关系,只需要把每一段的第一句(主题句)、第二句(解释句)连接起来就可以从形式和内容上对文章形成一个完整的框架。上面的这篇文章的第一段针对con flict提出一种传统观点,第二段为现代观点,第三、四、五段分别从三个方面对现代观点加以说明。或者,我们也可以用另外一种形式列出来:
【2014年提高六级阅读水平的一个有效途径】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30