But those who want to ban the bomb for American citizens claim that ifyou have one locked in the cabinet, with the fuse in a drawer, you would never be able to assemble it in time to stop an intruder ( 侵入者)
Another argument against allowing people to own a bomb is that at the moment it is very expensive to build one. So what your association is backing is a program which would allow the middle and upper classes to acquire a bomb while poor people will be left defenseless with just handguns.
这篇文章时而出现赞成氢弹的论调,时而出现反对 的论调。而文章又是以反对的论调结尾,因而可以判断出作者是反对私人拥有氢弹的(虽然问中没有明确出现作者态度,在此只能从文章末尾感知作者态度)。因而在做最后一道主题题(转变为态度题的考察)时就比较容易选择了。注意,不能选B或者D,这2项看似合理,但违背了四级文章对事不对人以及不能推理2 大原则。从出现频率上看,这类文章慢慢多了起来,所以应该多加留意。
30. From the tone of the passage we know that the author is
A) not serious about the private ownership of H-bombs
B) concerned about the spread of nuclear weapons
C) doubtful about the necessity of keeping H-bombs at home for safety
D) unhappy with those who vote against the ownership of H-bombs
【四级阅读题】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30