Even after the establishment of such token measures, reports from five consecutive years have indicated only negligible progress in solving this very perplexing problem. If we are to seriously address the problem we will need to minimize the amount of refuse we dispose of. New areas will need to be allocated for this purpose. The database of information collected should be detailed enough to responsibly direct our future actions.
Every community, whether large or small, is searching for a solution to this problem. Municipalities, in attempting to appraise the situation, have spent countless years in research, expending both time and money, looking for a homogeneous answer. The public, hoping to avoid the tragic consequences of a manipulated decision, refuses to give enthusiastic support to most proposals. Solicitors are hired to prepare confidential reports to convince the public to accept the municipalities suggestions. The choice of a specific piece of farmland as a landfill site often causes an instantaneous hysterical reaction. At local meetings citizens reproach government officials yelling their disapproval at the choice of a specific site. They vent their anger but are not always able to mobilize sufficient public support to effect a wise and acceptable decision.
Even though researchers claim that lined pits will not cause a drainage problem, the room for error is marginal. One flaw in the plan could be responsible for an epidemic or worse, causing multiple deaths. Any leaching from a landfill pit will create recurring difficulties in polluting a farmers well and the ground water. Polluted water flowing into lakes will affect fish and wildlife and will hinder the sportsmans pleasures. To articulate their concerns beforehand, will hopefully avoid grief in the future. A veiled threat to public health immediately creates a bias towards protecting the peoples safety and interests and establishing an educated suspicion.
【英语六级备考读文章记单词11】相关文章:
最新
2019-11-23
2019-11-23
2019-11-23
2019-11-23
2019-11-14
2019-11-14