The basis of this argument is , of course, knowing the value of money, and the idea that children of the poor know this, and those of the wealthy do not. The wealthy, though, is in a better position to teach their children the value of money. Who on earth will do the job better? someone skilled in earning and keeping it, the wealthy parent, or someone who can not seem to acquire it, the poor parent? In fact, both wealthy and poor children are equally likely to acquire an education in money, whether it is formal, or in the school of hard knocks. Conversely, both children are as likely to ignore this education. (101words)
点评:这段的内容感觉写得不够直接,还是在分析对方观点的漏洞!请注意,前面让步段已经这么写过了,那么这一段最好是正面地论证自己的观点,这样从内容上来说更 convincing 一点!此外,需要说明的是,大家发现作者的内容还是有一定深度,但是这是要有一定的英语功底才行的!如果英语功底不行的话,建议内容不要写太深,因为那样容易造成考官看不懂你在说什么!
上一段可以这样写:As is mentioned above, education plays an undeniable and decisive role in this controversial topic.There are plentiful stories to prove this. For example, the well- known billionaire Bill Gates Nevertheless, we still can find vivid stories of poor children form. poor families remain So , we can safely draw the conclusion that it is the education that.
【11月8日雅思考试冲刺作文写法指导和范文】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-03
2016-03-03
2016-03-03
2016-03-03
2016-03-03
2016-03-03