2015年GRE写作模拟题（5）Argument_GRE模拟题

2015年GRE写作模拟题（5）Argument

　　观点提示

　　1、作者认为EZ比ABC更值得，基于EZ一周收集两次垃圾而ABC只有一次。但并没有提出详细的信息证明一个月清理两次垃圾对于Walnut Grove是必要的。

　　2、此外，作者还指出EZ正在订购额外的卡车并提供许多额外服务，但并没有提供ABC的情况。首先，没必要，其次说不准ABC也有。

　　3、卡车作为固定资产的购入可能会增加收费。

　　范文：

　　The argument is not well reasoned at all, and it might be wise for Walnut Grove\'s town council to turn to ABC Disposal.

　　To begin with, despite EZ\'s weekly working frequency is as twice as ABC\'s, yet no sign has been displayed to prove that the "advantage" is necessary and fictional. For instance, if the town\'s garbage amount is under a particularly lower scale, which merely reaches the quantity of once disposal from ABC and hence the relatively once more from EZ is just a futile plethora. Also, even if twice disposal is applicable, it still deserves to doubt whether most citizens would like usual to choose EZ when taking into account the price of its service has been increased by $500 a month. Most citizens is highly possible to pick up a company that can offer best services while calling for relatively little money, for saving the extra $500, which to some extent is dispensable, I think, most citizens can cope with some easily handled trash with their own methods instead of singly relying on the disposal company.