So what’s your opinion on a Chinese “Ivy League”? Do we need one?
Yes. Ivy League or not, nine of China’s best universities cooperating is a good thing.
These universities combining resources could create a better environment for students and for research. It could also save a lot of time and resources because it would mean fewer unnecessary investments for some of the universities.
Allowing students to move to or have exchanges with other universities could broaden their horizons, improve their social skills and create more employment opportunities. The results could be more important than lessons and achievements.
The term “Ivy League” carries a sense of academic excellence, tradition and reputation. If borrowing such a term could encourage students’ and professors’ mental state and improve Chinese higher education, then there’s no reason not to do it.
No. Universities should do some work on increasing cooperation instead of copying an “Ivy League” model.
Many Chinese universities already have such cooperation with each other. If this cooperation were associated with the “Ivy League”, it would just distract (分散) attention and resources and have a negative effect.
These Chinese universities are all state-run and most get their funding from the government. They’re quite similar to each other in many ways and more cooperation wouldn’t bring about as much potential ability as between , say, public and private, or Chinese and foreign universities.
【2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题3 任务型阅读18】相关文章:
★ 湖南省岳阳市2014高考英语一轮单项选择训练题(16)及答案
★ 【优化方案】2017届高考英语二轮复习全国卷Ⅱ规范练:7(含解析)
★ 2017年高考英语二轮复习精品资料:专题14 阅读理解(押题专练)(原卷版)
★ 重庆市2014高考英语阅读理解一轮(精品)训练题(20)附答案
★ 贵州省贵阳市2014高考英语(新人教版)一轮阅读训练(27)附答案
最新
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-21
2017-04-21