Lee Lane, a visiting fellow at the Hudson Institute, takes the opposing view. He acknowledges that wildernesses do provide useful services, such as water conservation. But that is not, he argues, a reason to avoid all human presence, or indeed commercial and industrial exploitation. There are ever more people on the Earth, and they reasonably and rightfully want to have better lives, rather than merely struggle for survival. While the ways of using resources have improved, there is still a growing need for raw materials, and some wildernesses contain them in abundance. If they can be tapped without reducing the services those wildernesses provide, the argument goes, there is no further reason not to do so. Being untouched is not, in itself, a characteristic worth valuing above all others.
I look forward to seeing these views taken further, and to their being challenged by the other participants. One challenge that suggests itself to me is that both cases need to take on the question of spiritual value a little more directly. And there is a practical question as to whether wildernesses can be exploited without harm.
This is a topic that calls for not only free expression of feelings, but also the guidance of reason. What position wilderness should enjoy in the preservation of the world obviously deserves much more serious thinking.
1. John Sauven holds that .
A. many people value nature too much
【2016届高考英语二轮复习阅读理解七十五十集之连载训练:(40)】相关文章:
★ 【三维设计】2017届高考英语(江苏专用)二轮复习素材:高考单词5.高中英语常见词组
★ 重庆市2014高考英语阅读理解一轮(精品)训练题(15)附答案
★ 安徽省淮南市2014高考英语一轮单项选择及文章训练(17)及答案
★ 四川省2016届高考英语一轮复习课时作业(29) Module 5 The Great Sports Personality 外研版必修5
★ 【优化方案】2017届高考英语二轮复习全国卷Ⅱ规范练:3(含解析)
★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习大题冲关秘籍完形填空之记叙文:名校模拟(含解析)
★ 四川省2016届高考英语一轮复习课时作业(45) Module 3 Foreign Food 外研版选修8
★ 【优化方案】2017届高考英语二轮复习全国卷Ⅱ规范练:1(含解析)
最新
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-21
2017-04-21