Yesterday,hopes of achieving anything resembling clarity(清楚) from the World Health Organisation(WHO) were confused once again,which,widely expected to reduce the recommended sugar intake by a half in new draft guidance,instead said it would continue to recommend that sugar make up no more than 10 percent of the energy we consume,while adding that cutting this to five percent would have “additional benefits”.The decision will now go out to public consultation.
Simon Capewell,professor of the University of Liverpool,said that he suspected “dirty work” on the part of food and drinks companies might lie behind the WHO less than resounding message.
“The food industry say Government has no business interfering(介入) in families.We must protect personal choice,”Professor Capewell said.“We say there is no personal choice.At the moment,a mother can walk into a supermarket with a choice of four tomato soups—with three,or four,or five teaspoons of sugar in them.She has a choice of thousands of ready meals—with five,or six,or even nine teaspoons of sugar in.”
16.By referring to smoking the author indicates that
.
A.sugar has just turned out to be as harmful as smoking
B.it is not easy for authorities to restrict or ban something
C.it is easy for people to see bad effects of something
【2016届高考英语二轮复习专题(江苏专用):题型组合练(2)】相关文章:
★ 河南省三门峡市2014高考英语一轮(暑假)基础训练(5)附答案
★ 【课堂新坐标】2017届高考英语(通用版)二轮复习完形填空专题训练:技法3 利用词语习惯搭配解题(含解析)
★ 辽宁省辽阳市2014高考英语单项选择一轮(暑假)训练(15)附答案
★ 安徽省淮南市2014高考英语一轮单项选择及文章训练(4)及答案
★ 辽宁省辽阳市2014高考英语单项选择一轮(暑假)训练(7)附答案
★ 湖南省汝城二中2014届高考英语一轮复习阅读训练 (42)
★ 2017年高考英语二轮复习精品资料:专题15 完形填空(教学案)(原卷版)
最新
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-21
2017-04-21