Arguments against cloning are also on a perfectly practical side．Primarily, I believe that cloning would step in the normal "cycle" of life．There would be a large number of same genes, which reduce the chances of improvement, and, in turn, development—the fundamental reason how living things naturally adapt to the ever-changing environment．Life processes failing to do so might result in untimely disappearance．Furthermore, cloning would make the uniqueness that each one of us possesses disappear．Thus, leading to creation of genetically engineered groups of people for specific purposes and, chances are, that those individuals would be regarded as "objects" rather than people in the society．

　　Scientists haven't 100 per cent．guaranteed that the first cloned humans will be normal．Thus this could result in introduction of additional limitations in the human "gene-pool"．

　　Regarding such arguable topics in "black or white" approach seems very innocent to me personally．We should rather try to look at all "shades" of it．I believe that cloning is only legal if its purpose is for cloning organs; not humans．Then we could regard this as for "saving life" instead of "creating life"．I believe cloning humans is morally and socially unacceptable．

　　67．Which of the following is true according to the passage?

　　A．Genetic limitation will be beneficial for some women．

【2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：2（含解析）】相关文章：

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：20（含解析）

★ 2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：25 （含解析）

★ 2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：5 （含解析）

★ 2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：57 （含解析）

★ 2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：44 （含解析）

★ 2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：29 （含解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：17（含解析）

★ 2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：38 （含解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：15（含解析）

★ 2017届北京市高考英语一轮复习综合练习：45 （含解析）