Anyways, if you do things by committee, you act as a team or group. You reach a decision after much deliberation, discussion and dialogue. By contrast, if you act like a dictator, you make all decisions by yourself, alone, out of your own wits or whim.
That’s not to say, though, that doing everything by committee is preferable and at all times preferred by all. A committee can be and often is bureaucratic. They take time to make a decision, if they can reach a conclusion at all. And when they eventually do make a decision, they can make a mess of it. For example, as the adage goes, a camel is a horse designed by committee.
Overall, I think the jury is still out. In democratic societies, more people seem to think a committee is preferable to a dictatorship. Others, however, think a dictator is sometimes needed, like, when an urgent decision has to be made. Only days into his presidency, for example, Donald Trump made the decision to prevent travelling Muslims from entering America. Only a dictator could do a thing like that. I mean, he was in such a hurry – it was that urgent to him.
What do you think? Decision by dictatorship or by committee? Which is better?
Undecided? Should we form a committee? Will you be on the committee?
Well, I’ll quit fooling around and let’s read media examples of situations where people do or don’t do things by committee:
1. The brilliance of the individual and the stupidity of the group or committee is one of the most poisonous ideas in modern society.
【By committee?】相关文章:
★ 国际英语资讯:Pakistan calls for immediate U.S. actions against terrorists in Afghanistan
★ 观猴
★ 体坛英语资讯:Hungarian mayor, former Olympic champion expelled from Olympic Committee
★ 体坛英语资讯:Pyeongchang wins 2018 Winter Olympics
★ 国内英语资讯:Senior legislators study Xis speech at top disciplinary body session
★ 国内英语资讯:Chinas 12th NPC has 2,896 deputies
★ 国际英语资讯:Economic Watch: Agricultural reform key to Chinas prosperity
最新
2020-09-15
2020-08-28
2020-08-21
2020-08-19
2020-08-14
2020-08-12