B. They
allow
children
to
be
creative
or communicative.
C. Children using them may harm their mental and physical development.
D. Making parents realize the harm of children's using them is more important than banning.
5. Among the six people, who support the idea of banning children under 2 from using iPads and other electronic gadgets?
A. Mike and Ryan.
B. Nancy and Mike.
C. Nancy and Ryan.
D. Dianna and Shayla.
6. For Shayla, which is regarded as being a result of using iPads?
A. IPads serve as a tool for kids to learn a language.
B. Kids can become more independent and free themselves from their parents.
C. IPads are helpful for parents to babysit their children.
D. IPads can never do harm to kids' physical development.
【语篇解读】 本文是一篇议论文。台湾正考虑通过法律来规定2岁以下孩童禁用iPad及其他电子产品,18岁以下的未成年人也被限定使用电子产品的时间。那么,该不该禁止或限制孩子们使用电子产品呢?听听不同国家人们的观点吧。
4.解析:根据题干中的“Chinese woman”可将答案定位于第三段,由该段最后一句“I believe it is more important to educate parents than cautioning against the use of technology by young children”可知,来自中国的Lily认为,教育父母认识到其中的危害比禁止孩子使用电子产品更重要。故选D项。
【【师说】2017届高考英语二轮复习天天增分训练:29(含解析)】相关文章:
★ 【优化方案】2017届高考英语二轮复习全国卷Ⅱ规范练:7(含解析)
★ 【优化方案】2017届高考英语二轮复习全国卷Ⅱ规范练:3(含解析)
★ 【优化方案】2017届高考英语二轮复习全国卷Ⅱ题型重组训练:第4组(含解析)
★ 【师说】2017届高考英语二轮复习天天增分训练:6(含解析)
★ 【优化方案】2017届高考英语二轮复习全国卷Ⅱ规范练:8(含解析)
最新
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-21
2017-04-21