The other study involved children. It was presented last month in California at a conference on violence and abuse. Researchers used intelligence tests given to two groups. More than eight hundred children aged two to four the first time they were tested. More than seven hundred children aged five to nine.

　　The two groups were retested four years later, and the study compared the results with the first test. Both groups contained children whose parents used physical punishment and children whose parents did not. The study says the IQs--or intelligence quotients--of the younger children who were not spanked were five points higher than those who were. In the older group, the difference was almost three points.

　　Murray Strauss from the University of New Hampshire worked with Mallie Paschall from the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation. Professor Strauss has written extensively about physical punishment of children. He says the more they are spanked, the slower their mental development. He also looked at average IQs in other nations and found them lower where spanking was more common.

　　1．Which could be the best title of the passage?

　　A. Punishment

　　B. The Best Way to Influence Behavior.

　　C. Punishment or Reward: Which Works Better on Behavior?

　　D. Two Recent Studies.

　　2．The underlined word “spanked” probably means______.

【2017届高考英语一轮复习提能训练：2（北师大版含解析）】相关文章：

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：20（含解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：21（含解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：7（含解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：23（含解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：8（含解析）

★ 2014高考英语（新人教版）一轮基础训练（9）A、B卷（附答案或解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：12（含解析）

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：1（含解析）

★ 贵州省贵阳市2014高考英语（新人教版）一轮阅读训练（31）附答案

★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习课时训练：16（含解析）