The researchers were most surprised to find that a strong sense of justice was negatively correlated with a willingness to apologize, perhaps suggesting that contrition(忏悔) and an “eye for an eye” philosophy are incompatible(不相容的). Reconciliation(和解) may end a conflict, but it cannot always settle a score.
46. What method did Andrew Howell and his colleagues use in the study?
A. Observing people.
B. Interviewing people.
C. Doing lab experiments.
D. Collecting information.
47. What kind of people are more likely to apologize?
A. Intelligent people.
B. Confident people.
C. People valuing fairness.
D. People feeling sorry for themselves.
48. The underlined sentence in the last paragraph suggests
.
A. an end of conflict doesn’t mean wrongdoers have been punished
B. “an eye for an eye” philosophy cannot solve an argument
C. only by deep regret can one learn the lesson of his wrongdoing
D. unsatisfactory compromises cannot end a conflict peacefully
49. The study done by Andrew Howell and his colleagues reveals
.
A. what influences one to be a willing apologizer
B. when people might apologize willingly
【2016年高考英语原创押题预测卷:02(浙江卷)(原卷版)】相关文章:
★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习大题冲关秘籍阅读理解七选五:名校模拟(含解析)
★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习大题冲关秘籍完形填空之记叙文:解题技巧(含解析)
★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习大题冲关秘籍短文改错:创新押题(含解析)
最新
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-21
2017-04-21