Many military women who constitute 14% of the 1.4 million active members of the military object to the policy because it stops them from applying for some 238,000 jobs and excludes (排除) them from certain promotions. It is particularly unfair because it doesn?t protect women in service. Fully 85% of women, who have served since Sept. 11, report having served in a combat zone or an area where they were faced with combat or immediate danger according to the lawsuit, and half reported being involved in combat operations. At least 860 female troops have been wounded and 144 killed in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
In fact, as Hegar?s suit argues, the ban actually puts women in greater danger. In many cases, women fight alongside men in “female engagement teams” that endure the same conditions, but because they are thought not combat eligible (有资格的) they may not have received proper training.
The ban does another bad thing: drive talented women out of service. Hegar says she is asked to leave the Air National Guard for a Reserve Liaison position because she is excluded from jobs she would like to apply for. Another woman who is suing, Captain Alexandra Zoe Bedell who was sent twice to Afghanistan, left active duty last year, because of the combat exclusion policy.
It is hard to see how the Pentagon could meet this burden. Clearly, women are capable of taking challenging, dangerous combat assignments, because as the careers of Hegar and others like her have shown they are doing it now. The Pentagon’s policy is based on “outdated idea of women”, just the sort of thing the Constitution forbids.
【2016届高考英语二轮复习专项训练:专题限时检测(21)阅读理解主旨大意类之全文大意题与段落大意题】相关文章:
★ 【课堂新坐标】2017届高考英语(通用版)二轮复习短文改错专题训练:训练4 短文改错(Ⅳ)(含解析)
★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习大题冲关秘籍短文改错:名校模拟(含解析)
★ 2017年高考英语二轮复习精品资料:专题15 完形填空(押题专练)(原卷版)
★ 2017届高考英语二轮复习大题冲关秘籍阅读理解七选五:创新押题(含解析)
最新
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-21
2017-04-21