Allowing students to move to or have exchanges with other universities could broaden their horizons, improve their social skills and create more employment opportunities. The results could be more important than lessons and achievements.
The term “Ivy League” carries a sense of academic excellence, tradition and reputation. If borrowing such a term could encourage students’ and professors’ mental state and improve Chinese higher education, then there’s no reason not to do it.
No. Universities should do some work on increasing cooperation instead of copying an “Ivy League” model.
Many Chinese universities already have such cooperation with each other. If this cooperation were associated with the “Ivy League”, it would just distract (分散) attention and resources and have a negative effect.
These Chinese universities are all state-run and most get their funding from the government. They’re quite similar to each other in many ways and more cooperation wouldn’t bring about as much potential ability as between , say, public and private, or Chinese and foreign universities.
China should find its own way to develop world-class universities instead of by copying some foreign practices. We have our own unique conditions and foreign lessons often don’t apply well here.
Ivy in America Originally referred to an athletic conference of eight famous universities in the
【2017届江苏省江阴市高考英语专项训练:任务型阅读及信息匹配(5)及答案】相关文章:
★ 贵州省贵阳市2014高考英语(新人教版)一轮阅读训练(25)附答案
★ 常熟市2014高考英阅读理解语一轮(暑假)训练题(3)及答案
★ 重庆市2014高考英语阅读理解一轮(精品)训练题(1)附答案
★ 浙江省湖州市2014高考英语完形填空一轮(暑假)精炼(4)含答案
★ 浙江省湖州市2014高考英语完形填空一轮(暑假)精炼(13)含答案
★ 重庆市2014高考英语阅读理解一轮(精品)训练题(5)附答案
★ 安徽省淮南市2014高考英语一轮单项选择及文章训练(9)及答案
最新
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-24
2017-04-21
2017-04-21