In terms of the situation, we have six times as many people on the right side as on the other side, but whoever loses may not win. The debate officially began. The two sides first expressed their views. "We think it's beneficial to open the book," said the main debater. Gorky once said: "books are the ladder of human progress." In this information-based world, if you lack knowledge, you will feel hungry. Reading more books can cultivate your health and improve your writing level. So it's good to open a book. The opponent's main debater listened and couldn't wait to say: "we don't think it's beneficial to open the volume.". Because now some students like to read martial arts novels, martial arts novels and romance novels. They are fascinated by them. They also read them in class, walking and imitating the scenes in the books. Therefore, we should read good books as well. We can't read those messy books. " People in the right direction are worried again: "although there is no great advantage in a messy book, you can always learn a little bit of characters, words, and every book has its advantages. Even martial arts novels will know some historical stories." "What's more, if it's a person who reads a mess of books, he must be a person with a bad mind. If the person who reads a book has a good mind, he won't read those books, so it's very important for the person who reads a book to read a book with what kind of mind." Another person on the right side retorted. For example, Su Ying and Lin Qiaoyuan in our class are fascinated by romance novels, and they also read the platoon I think: No, the right side has been caught. Lin Qiaoyuan and Su Ying are not convinced. Because of this, the debate between the two sides is more intense. When you say a word and I say a word, they are all like little cockerels fighting with red eyes.
【记一次辩论会】相关文章:
★ 记一次辩论会
★ 记一次辩论会
★ 重要的一天
★ 记一次辩论会
★ 记一次辩论会
★ Take the Responsibility 承担责任