终于,到了决胜负的时候了,我们双方都把自己的“杀手锏”拿了出来,在这场激烈的“战争”中,大家都提出了坚定的观点,大家为了这个观点都费尽了口舌,正反的第一辩邹阳露瑶说:“如果开卷未必有益”那我们从什么地方学到知识呢?正反的第三辩刘加洲说:读书就像往一个水库里加水,只要一直往里头装水才能越来越聪明。反方第一辩也就是我:有的同学看书只是为了得到表扬。并没有细读,许多也只是光看故事情节,不会欣赏书的艺术价值和深刻内涵,所以并未受益。反方第二辩说:书有好坏之分,正邪之别。所以须读好书,但有些同学并不明白这一观点,所以:开卷未必有益。
Finally, when it's time to win, both of us have taken out our own "killer mace". In this fierce "war", we all put forward a firm point of view, for which we have spent a lot of words. The first debate, positive and negative, Zou yangluyao, said, "if it is not beneficial to open a book, then where can we learn knowledge?"? Liu Jiazhou, the third debate on positive and negative, said: reading is like adding water to a reservoir. As long as you keep adding water to it, you will become more and more intelligent. The first argument of the opposite side is me: some students read books just to get praise. There is no close reading, many just read the story, not appreciate the book's artistic value and profound connotation, so they did not benefit. The second argument of the opposite side is that books can be divided into good and bad, good and evil. Therefore, it is necessary to read good books, but some students do not understand this point of view, so: opening a book is not necessarily beneficial.
【记一次辩论会】相关文章:
★ 记一次辩论会
★ 记一次辩论会
★ 记一次辩论会
★ 记一次辩论会
★ 重要的一天