马莱斯的见解的确惊世骇俗,但我不同意这种说法,假如外星人真的来过地球,真的与猿繁衍出新猿,那么在这400万年中,难道会一点痕迹都没有吗?如果地球人真的起源于外星人,那么发现了30万年前、40万年前乃至100万~200万年前的古代类人猿化石又如何解释?虽然总有所谓的“ufo”出现在地球的上空,刺激着我们的眼球,可又有谁见过外星人呢?
Marley's opinion is really shocking, but I don't agree with that. If aliens really came to the earth and really bred new apes with apes, wouldn't there be any trace in the four million years? If human beings on earth really originated from aliens, how can we explain the discovery of ancient anthropoid fossils 300000 years ago, 400000 years ago and even 1-2 million years ago? Although the so-called "UFO" always appears in the sky over the earth, stimulating our eyes, who has ever seen an alien?
我比较赞同的是海猿说。1960年,英国的人类学家阿利斯特·哈代提出:在化石空白期,人类的祖先不是生活在陆地上,而是生活在海洋中。
I am more in favor of the sea ape. In 1960, British anthropologist Alister Hardy proposed that in the fossil blank period, human ancestors did not live on land, but in the sea.
【人类起源之我见】相关文章:
★ 初一英语作文:暑假英语作文--A New Term Began