有些人认为这个政策深深地伤害了贫困生的感情。学校要求那些想得到奖学金支助的贫困生必须得在全班面前做个演讲。他们必须得列出能够证明他们贫困的证据,有些人还得说他们小时候的悲惨经历来说服同学们给他投票。反对这个哭穷政策的人认为这给贫困生造成了双重的伤害,贫困已经让他们感觉够糟的了,现在他们还得为了摆脱贫困而暴露他们贫困的窘境,这让他们更加悲催了。
However, some people think that this kindof speech policy would help the poor students not only in the poverty but alsocould gain the faith to fight for their poverty. People cannot choose thefamily they were born into, but they can always choose their future, so if theywant to get out of the current situation they have to face it first, and be notafraid to fight for it. No pain no gain.
然而,有些人认为这样的演说政策不仅能够帮助贫困生摆脱困境,也能给他们增加为摆脱贫困而奋斗的信念。人们不同选择他们的出身,但是他们能够选择他们的未来,所以如果他们想走出现在的境遇,他们必须得先面对它,不能因害怕而不去奋斗。没有付出就没有收获。
Weighting up there two arguments intoaccount, I am for the former one, the scholarship seats are limited, and the numberof poor students are large. Most of them are ended up with nothing. Hence, thepolicy should be changed.
【Vote for Poverty 为贫穷投票】相关文章:
★ 2014年12月大学英语六级考试真题作文权威点评(点点版)
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-08-28
2020-08-28
2020-08-28