The basis of this argument is, of course, knowing the value of money, and the idea that children of the poor know this, and those of the wealthy do not . Who though, is in a better position to teach their children the value of money; someone skilled in earning and keeping it, the wealthy parent, or someone who can not seem to acquire it, the poor parent? Both wealthy and poor children are equally likely to acquire an education in money, whether it is formal, or in the school of hard knocks. Conversely, both children are as likely to ignore this education.

　　A poor child may believe that one can get along, if not as easily, without wealth. A wealthy child may be well trained by a parent steeped in the knowledge of money management; the key to developing this skill is education.

【雅思写作8分范文：children with unwealthy parents are better?】相关文章：

★ 雅思写作范文：nature or nurture？(一)

★ 雅思写作参考范文：烟草是毒品吗?

★ 雅思大作文范文：Sports should not be encouraged

★ 雅思写作高分词汇：文化篇

★ 雅思写作范文：独居的利弊

★ 雅思小作文怎么写：Integrity and Perfection

★ 雅思写作范文：nature or nurture？(八)

★ 雅思写作范文：Sport Event

★ 雅思写作参考范文：警察带枪？

★ 雅思写作之中式思维范文(bicycle)