所以是很矛盾的,用了but 转折
It has also been proposed that just because we know so much about people intuitively, there has been less incentive for studying them scientifically; why should one develop a theory, carry out systematic observations, or make predictions about the obvious?
第二个解释出现了?
为什么没有去研究scientific psychology呢?因为我们本能的就已经知道很多了,所以没有动力去研究它了。为什么要对明显的现象发展出一个理论呢?
In any case, the field of human relations, with its vast literary documentation but meager scientific treatment, is in great contrast to the field of physic in which there are relatively few nonscientific books.
Vast literary documentation对应哪里?
第一段的,innumerable myths, folktales, novels, poems, plays, and popular or philosophical essays
meager scientific treatment对应哪里?
全篇文章讨论的,scientific psychology的研究少之又少
the field of human relation 和the field of physic的关系是?
Contrast
那么科学应该是?
Treatment很多,但是documentation很少
第二篇:
Many theories have been formulated to explain the role of grazers such as zooplankton in controlling the amount of planktonic algae in lakes.
【教你如何科学阅读GRE/GMAT的文章】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01