(2)正文:尽管这是逻辑作文,题干给的像以前的逻辑单题,但是她是一种作文,不是客观题。大量的使用刻板的逻辑句式对于文章的生动性百害而无一利。很多考生背会了什么孙氏逻辑句法就在正文处大打出手,用些看上去极能唬人的分析句式,像逻辑专业出身的人那样,左一句the arguer commits a fallacy of false analogy,右一句the arguer rests his conclusion on the classic logic fallacy ofpost hoc, ergo propter hoc。连拉丁文都用上了,你说老美做何感想。按中国人的话说,叫掉书袋,当诸位考生还在自我为这种呆板的句式乐此不疲的时候,你是否留意过GRE作文在你的手下是不是有些散发出像死尸一样的苍白来。作文者,就是要以能说明问题为先,而不是在这里装神弄鬼,尽管逻辑方面的论证我们需要逻辑知识的支撑,但是我们要作好的是只是借题发挥,点到即止。
正确的做法应该是掌握住错误,揪住对方的小辫,然后适当搭配着证据的罗列称述,合理选用逻辑句式,一说明问题立刻回来,尽量用例证不要去做逻辑上的因果论证。具体请参看对比以下范文:
4.The following was posted on an Internet real estate discussion site. Of the two leading real estate firms in our town-Adams Realty and Fitch Realty-Adams is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch, and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitchs $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams.
【GRE作文入门和进阶二十三】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01