COMMENTARY考试大-中国教育考试门户网站
This outstanding response begins somewhat hesitantly; the opening paragraphs summarize but do not immediately engage the argument.
However, the subsequent paragraphs target the central flaws in the argument and analyze them in almost microscopic detail.
The writers main rebuttal points out that using a piece of land to build a school is not the same thing as using it for natural parkland.
Several subpoints develop this critique, offering perceptive reasons to counter the arguments unsubstantiated assumptions.
This is linked to a related discussion that pointedly exposes another piece of faulty reasoning: that using land for athletic fields rationalizes the destruction of the park.
The extensively developed and organically organized analysis continues into a final paragraph that takes issue with the arguments conclusion that there would be no better use of land in our community than this.
Diction and syntax are varied and sophisticated, and the writer is fully in control of the standard conventions.
While there may be stronger papers that merit a score of 6, this essay demonstrates insightful analysis, cogent development, and mastery of writing.
It clearly earns a 6.
【GRE写作argument全部官方范文分析(7)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01