得出这个结论是基于这样几个前提:
前提1:居民更喜欢水上运动,证据:Survey
前提2:河水利用率低是由于水质问题,证据:居民的抱怨
前提3:river usage is sure to increase,因为do the river clean up
从新GRE写作满分范文来看,整篇文章结构明朗,每段结构也很清晰。传统的5段式,3个反驳点。
首段:While it may be true that the Mason City government ought to devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this authors argument does not make a cogent case for increased resources based on river use.指出结论以及作者的文章逻辑证明存在问题,没有其它多余的废话。
第二段:Citing surveys of city residents, the author reports city residents love of water sports先写作者如何认为,然后写自己的反驳,质疑Survey的准确性,加举例,连用了自己的3个假设进行反驳。最后还加上觉得怎样才算好的论证。
第三段:Additionally, the author implies that residents do not use the river for swimming,boating,and fishing,despite their professed interest,because the water is polluted and smelly.也是先写作者观点;接着自己的反驳+进一步展开;最后能加上认为可行的论证建议是最好的了,这样不会一味批判到底,段内结构更完整。
【GRE写作范文结构思路解析】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01