There are four tests which draw that line and define the difference.
First, we must respect the integrity of religion itself.
People of conscience should be careful how they deal in the word of their Lord. In our own history, religion has been falsely invoked to sanction prejudice -- even slavery -- to condemn labor unions and public spending for the poor. I believe that the prophecy, The poor you have always with you is an indictment, not a commandment. And I respectfully suggest that God has taken no position on the Department of Education -- and that a balanced budget constitutional amendment is a matter of economic analysis, and not heavenly appeals.
Religious values cannot be excluded from every public issue; but not every public issue involves religious values. And how ironic it is when those very values are denied in the name of religion. For example, we are sometimes told that it is wrong to feed the hungry, but that mission is an explicit mandate given to us in the 25th chapter of Matthew.
Second, we must respect the independent judgments of conscience.
Those who proclaim moral and religious values can offer counsel, but they should not casually treat a position on a public issue as a test of fealty to faith. Just as I disagree with the Catholic bishops on tuition tax credits -- which I oppose -- so other Catholics can and do disagree with the hierarchy, on the basis of honest conviction, on the question of the nuclear freeze.
【美国经典英文演讲100篇:"Truth and Tolerance in America"】相关文章:
★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:Sproul Hall Sit-in Speech
★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:1988 DNC Address(下)
★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:40th Anniversary of D-Day Address
★ 美国驻中华人民共和国大使骆家辉在大使官邸媒体见面会的讲话
★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:"Television and the Public Interest"
★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:Address on Taking the Oath of Office
最新
2019-11-14
2019-11-09
2019-11-09
2019-11-08
2019-11-08
2019-11-07