那么GMAT到底通过Argument考察什么东西呢?换句话说,到底什么才是Argument找逻辑错误的关键呢?在对Argument的教授和研究的过程中,我个人觉得最重要的部分其实并不是识别这些逻辑错误范式本身。有一个更重要的而大部分同学会忽视的内容,那就是读题以及通过读题来提炼作者的逻辑链。
我们通过一道题来说明读题和对题目逻辑链的分析对Argument写作的重要性。
The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life:
Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helioss unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the regions manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.
如果我们老老实实对题目的逻辑链进行分析的话,会发现这道题是四个证据得出一个结论的逻辑构架:
搞清楚逻辑链,再接下来攻击,其实是一件非常简单的事情。同学们只要去想一件事情即可,那就是:凭什么这个证据能够得出这个结论?在什么情况下,证据是不能得出结论的?(即:举反例)
【新GMAT改革:读题在Argument写作中的重要性】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02
2016-03-02