First and foremost, the author assumes that the only factor that influences the price of citrus fruit is the weather. Other factors such as monetary inflation, increased distribution and labor costs, or alterations in supply and demand conditions are completely ignored as possible sources for the increase. The charge that citrus growers have unnecessarily raised prices can be sustained only if these and other possible factors can be completely ruled out as contributing to the price increases. Since the author fails to address these factors, the recommendation calling for strict pricing regulations can be dismissed out of hand as frivolous.

　　Second, the author assumes that the only way to combat increased prices is through government intervention. In a free enterprise system many other means of affecting the pricing of goods are available. For example, boycotting a product and thereby influencing supply and demand conditions of the commodity is an effective means of influencing the price of the product. In a free market economy the call for price regulation by the government should occur only when all other means to rectify the problem have been exhausted.

　　In conclusion, the authors argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument it would be necessary to show that the only factor influencing the price increases is the growers desire for increased profits.

　　95. The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper.

【GMAT新黄金80题及范文(十三)】相关文章：

★ GMAT Argument写作范文(1)

★ GMAT作文范文精选（41）

★ GMAT写作黄金80题（7）

★ GMAT作文范文精选（33）

★ GMAT作文范文精选（24）

★ GMAT作文范文：Issue （6）

★ GMAT写作黄金80题（18）

★ 写作辅导：GMAT作文黄金80题（1）

★ GMAT写作黄金80题（15）

★ GMAT作文范文精选（9）