但是关于新加坡国联企业的学术研究越少越令人鼓舞。
A 2004 article by Carlos Ramirez of George Mason University and Ling Hui Tan of the IMFshowed that the country s GLCs enjoyed a higher market value, relative to the book value oftheir assets, than comparable private firms.
乔治梅森的卡洛斯拉米雷斯和国际货币基金组织的Ling Hui Tan 2004发表的一篇文章表明,就资产净值而言,新加坡的国联企业比起私人企业有更高的市场价值。
They also generated a higher return on assets, on average.
他们还创造更高的平均投资回报。
In judging the performance of Temasek s GLCs, the counterfactual is important.
在评价淡马锡的国联企业的表现时,反事实的情况很重要。
They may not be as obviously successful as private titans from the region such as Samsung orLG.
他们可能不会像亚洲私人公司巨头那样有着明显的成功,如三星、LG。
But they are not nearly as bad as most SOEs, including China s.
但是他们几乎不会像大多数国有企业包括中国的国有企业那样糟糕。
The enthusiasm for reform of SOEs in China reflects their deteriorating returns andaccumulating debt.
【2015考研英语阅读改革中国国有企业】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30