在这些儿童四个月时,Andersson博士重新对他们进行检查并抽取血样。
Those babies whose umbilical clamps had been applied after three minutes had, on average,
那些脐带在三分钟后才被钳住的儿童,
iron levels 45% higher than those whose cords had been clamped immediately.
体内的铁元素平均水平要比采用速钳法的儿童高出45%。
Put another way, only 0.6% of them were anaemic, compared with 5.7% of the rapidlyclamped.
从另一个角度看,相较于采用速钳法的儿童中5.7%的贫血症发生率,他们的这个比例只有0.6%。
Rapid clamping of the umbilicus, then, seems to cause one child in 20 to become anaemic, atleast in the early months of its life.
看起来速钳法在每20个儿童中便导致一例在其出生后的最初几个月内发生贫血。
Any experiment of this sort needs to be repeated, of course, to check it is correct.
当然,这类研究结果都需要通过重复实验来验证可靠性。
But if it is, then the burden of proof in the matter of when to cut the cord will have shiftedfrom those who would cut late to those who would cut early.
但如果这个结论确实正确,那么采用速钳法的人将更有义务来证明为什么要迅速的剪断脐带,
【2015考研英语阅读简单的输血】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30