The case involved a gang rape in the state of Georgia, in which one of the rapists testifiedagainst three other suspects in exchange for a lighter sentence,
这起案件涉及到一宗乔治亚州的轮奸案,其中一名强奸犯为了让自己获得轻判做了不利于其它三名嫌疑者的证言,
as part of a plea bargain.
作为认罪辩诉协议的一部分。
All three denied involvement, but the two DNA examiners in the original case both foundthat they could not exclude one of the three from having been involved, based on ananalysis of swabs taken from the victim.
其他三名嫌疑人全部否认参与强奸,但是根据从受害者处提取的药签分析,原案中有两位DNA鉴定师都发现他们无法排除三名中的其中一名参与了强奸。
As is almost always true in forensic-science laboratories, these examiners knew what thecase was about.
由于在司法科学实验室里总是什么都是对的,这些鉴定师们知道这个案子到底是怎么回事了。
And their findings were crucial to the outcome because in Georgia, as in many other states,a plea bargain cannot be accepted without corroborating evidence.
而且他们的手指对于出来的结果是至关重要的,因为在乔治亚,同时也在很多其它州,认罪辩诉如果没有确实的证据是无法被接受的。
【2015考研英语阅读司法科学】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30