两项由Paul Gompers,Joy Ishii 和Andrew Metrick三人进行的对美国公司的研究包括了1994年到2002年的内容,发现当所有股东商谈平等投票表决权时,实行双重标准的公司表现的比同类公司差劲。
Dual-class firms are fonder of debt than equity, to prevent the dilution of controllingstakes. Yet surprisingly, their shares do not trade at a big discount on stockmarkets. A studyby Chad Zutter and Scott Smart found that dual-class initial public offerings achievedonly slightly lower price-earnings and price-sales ratios than comparable single-classIPOs。
实行双重标准的公司更倾向于运用债务而不是资本金来降低控制风险。然而令人吃惊的是,他们的股份不会在股票市场上以很大的折扣进行交易。一项由Chad Zutter和Scott Smart主持的研究发现,双重标准IPO达到的跟同类单标准IPO公司相比只是轻微地降低了市盈率。
Nor does this strange ownership model show any sign of going out of fashion. There were 12dual-class IPOs in America last year, not far from the norm for the nine-year period in the1990s studied by Mr Zutter and Mr Smart.
但这种奇怪的所有权例子也没有任何过时的迹象。美国去年有12家进行双重标准IPO的公司,这与Zutter和Smart先生研究的20世纪90年代中实行的标准相差无几。
【2015考研英语阅读双重股份制结构】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30