巴特斯和皮塞罗博士对 失控电车困境 和性格测试的结果归类发现,在道德困境问题中表现出功利主义大部分表现为心理阴暗,玩弄权术又或者对人生绝望。
Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not veryhappy people themselves.
由此可见,尽管功利主义者或许能提高人类总体的幸福,但本身却不见得幸福。
That does not make utilitarianism wrong.
这并不是说功利主义不正确。
Crafting legislationone of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improveinevitably involves riding roughshod over someone s interests.
边沁和穆勒一直追求更为公正的立法,但在这个过程中,某些人的利益无可避免的将被残酷打压。
Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled.
功利主义者为打压提供了一种合理的理论。
The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the typeof people who you want making the laws.
但巴斯滕和皮塞罗博士的研究却质问我们选举立法人员的准则。
Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
心理阴暗,玩弄权术还有反人类的人可以立法吗?可以,大众很明显寄望这些人。
【2015考研英语阅读功利主义者绝非善类】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30