Mr Grunwald s heart plainly beats on the left, and it is clear that he admires Mr Obama, withhis hyper-rational side. At the same time, the author does make some effort to explain theRepublican point of view. The whole point of an economic stimulus is that it is supposed tostimulate. It needs to move money out of the door fast, get it quickly to where it can domost good and not carry with it a tail of long-term spending commitments. But Mr Obama sagenda was always much bigger than that, and it is in explaining this that Mr Grunwald sbook is at its best.
可以看出,格伦沃尔德倾向于左派;他有过于理性的一面,显然比较赞赏奥巴马。然而,他的确也做了一些努力来阐述共和党的观点。经济刺激的全部意义就在于它应当去进行刺激。它需要让资金涌出闸门,迅速把这笔钱送到能带来最多效益的地方,而不是拖着长期开支投入的尾巴。但奥巴马的胃口总是远不止如此,而格伦沃尔德这本书最擅长的就是解释这一点。
Much of the meat involves parsing the issues that riled the Republicans: how the stimulus billwas to be used as a tool to transform American society. Right from the start, Mr Obamawanted his Recovery Act to spend money on a low-carbon future, on radical school reform,on health reform and on creating jobs. All of these, Mr Grunwald thinks, are laudable aims.Many readers would agree. But Republicans in Washington have other views. New energyprojects, like job creation, should be left to the market, not picked by bureaucrats; school andhealth reform should be a matter for individual states. What they saw was an attempt to usethe crisis to push the political economy of America in a more statist and Washington-centricdirection. Mr Grunwald does not attempt to deny that; it is simply that he has no problemwith it.
【2015考研英语阅读美国与复苏政治学】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30