An honest Republican candidate would acknowledge this and lay out the right way to do sofor instance, by eliminating distorting loopholes and thus allowing revenues to rise. He would also come up with a more systematic plan on the spending side. No Republicanseems to understand the difference between good spending and bad. Investment in roads andeducation, for instance, ought not to be lumped in with costly and unreformed entitlements,like Social Security and Medicare. Defence should not be sacrosanct. That Mr Obama has nostrategy either is not an excuse.
一位诚实的共和党候选人将会承认这一事实并提出正确的方案 比如,通过去除各种扭曲的财政漏洞而使收入增加。他可以就财政开支提出一个更系统性的方案。而似乎没有一个共和党人能明白有益开支和有害开支的区别。比如说,在道路和教育上的投资不应该被归并为昂贵的待改革的津贴,后者如社保和医疗。辩解不必是神圣不可侵犯的。奥巴马先生没有提出战略也不是借口。
In most elections promising toughness is not a successful tactic; but this time Americansknow that their country has huge problems and that their nations finances are the biggestproblem of all. In Britain the Conservatives made the incumbent Gordon Brown seemridiculous by spelling out the austerity that he at first barely dared mention; now anothertough-talking centre-right party has won in Portugal . If ever there was a time forpragmatic conservative realism, it is now. Mr Obama might also bear that in mind.
【2015考研英语阅读奥巴马与共和党】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30