Critics have also questioned the memoirs account of the Chevaliers escape from a notorious prison in Venice, Italy. He claims to have escaped the Venetian prison by using a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof. Critics claim that while such a daring escape makes for enjoyable reading, it is more likely that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him. They point out that the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.
批评家还对回忆录中的一个细节提出了质疑,就是骑士先生对于自己从意大利威尼斯一个臭名昭著的监狱逃出的情节。骑士自己声场他是越狱逃出的,用一块铁片在天花板上弄出洞,然后从屋顶翻出来。批评家说尽管这种冒险的越狱行为让这本书更具有可读性,但是事实上是骑士先生通过贿赂狱卒的方式获得自由的。批评家们指出,骑士先生在威尼斯政界有不少朋友,而这些朋友可以帮他贿赂狱卒。
阅读部分需要提取的观点是:
- Main point: 塞恩加尔骑士的回忆录不够精确
- Sub point 1:回忆录声称自己很有钱,但是事实上不是
- Sub point 2:回忆录上对于他跟伏尔泰交谈记录得过于详细,不合常理
- Sub point 3:他声称自己在威尼斯越狱,但实际上他是政界朋友帮忙行贿才获得自由的
【新托福TPO 8综合写作详细解析:塞恩加尔骑士的回忆录】相关文章:
最新
2017-06-13
2016-02-26
2016-02-26
2016-02-26
2016-02-26
2016-02-26