First, charging a fee for driving in the inner city - within the third or fourth ring roads, for example.
Second, charging a pollution fee.
The pollution fee is verifiable. Car owners account only for a minor proportion of the total population. It is unfair for non-drivers to suffer polluted air when it is not their fault. Charging car owners to finance causes of public good is a kind of compensation for the non-owners.
Some people might argue that an inner city fee would benefit the rich and deprive ordinary citizens' right to auto mobility. But it is not.
What would be restricted is driving on crowded roads in densely populated areas, which is far from a pleasant business. If the rich enjoy driving in such conditions, let them do it and pay for being part of the congestion. Of course, the charge should be set very high.
Technical feasibility is not a problem.
Another reason why motorists do not like public transport is that it is inconvenient and takes longer.
Commuters might have to change trains or buses two or three times to get to their destination. Buses and subway trains are invariably crowded and waiting at bus stops can be chaotic.
Many people have tried public transport but returned to their private vehicles for the reasons given above. If the problems are solved, many commuters will opt for public transport.
To settle these problems and ensure a fast, effective and orderly public transport system needs government action. However, campaign-style promotions and empty slogans won't do.
【Look to drivers for traffic solution】相关文章:
★ 小学英语教学过程中,教学原则与教学方法如何有机结合(2)
★ Book 3 unit 11 The fireman can help 教学随笔
最新
2020-09-15
2020-08-28
2020-08-21
2020-08-19
2020-08-14
2020-08-12