The second part of the study observed how students would do in certain group contexts. About 300 students worked alone to create a gift that would impress others visiting their campus. Next, they were told they would be video chatting with two other members of their group to share their ideas.
研究的第二部分观察到学生在特定的小组活动中的表现。约有300名学生单独作业创制一份可以打动校园来访人员的礼物。接下来,告知这些学生他们将会和小组其他两名成员视频对话来交流分享想法。
What the students didn’t know is that their online group members were actually assistants working for the researchers, who were told to give either supportive or negative feedback. This time, students were likely to only share their ideas if their ‘partners’ had smart ideas and gave negative feedback. In other words, the disagreeable individuals don't worry about the possibility that someone won't like their ideas.
学生们有所不知的是网上的小组成员实际是研究的助手,事先被告知要给出正面或是负面的反馈。这一次,只有“小伙伴”有好点子和给予负面反馈的情况,学生们才愿意把想法分享给对他们。换句话说,性格不讨喜者并不担心别人会不喜欢他们的想法。
The study suggests that individuals who are disagreeable or 'jerks' are more successful because they are better at getting their ideas heard in a group and that in supportive environments, may be useful because agreeable people will be more receptive to positive feedback.
【性格不讨喜,反而易成功?】相关文章:
★ 7个腹部减肥运动
最新
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-05