“Our research is one of the first attempts to assess whether voice pitch plays a role in the labor markets of corporate executives,” says Mayew, an associate professor at Fuqua whose specialty is studying management communications during conference calls. To do the voice pitch study, Mayew and his colleagues pulled recordings of CEOs from conference calls and YouTube videos of interviews on CNBC.
“我们的研究首次致力于研究评估声调在企业高管人力资源市场中是否有作用。”福库商学院的一位专门研究电话会议中管理层沟通情况的副教授梅修说。为了做声调的研究,梅修和他的同事从电话会议和YouTube上面CNBC采访的视频中截取这些CEO的录音。
The analysis showed that CEOs with lower voices manage bigger companies and, as a result, make more money. The researchers got quite specific in their findings, claiming that a decrease in voice pitch of 22.1 hertz, translates to an increase in company size of $440 million in assets. They also found that CEOs with lower-pitched voices earned an average of $187,000 a year more than CEOs with higher-pitched voices. What is 22.1 hertz in the real world? Mayew suggests comparing the pitch of James Earl Jones’s voice with Mike Tyson’s and then measuring about a sixth of the difference between the two.
分析的结果表明拥有较低的声调的CEO们管理着更大规模的公司,因此,他们的收入相应地也会更高。研究者们从他们的研究中得出了很具体的结论,他们表示当声调平均每下降22.1赫兹,CEO所在的公司的资产就会多4.4亿美元。他们同时也发现嗓音更低沉的CEO比嗓音高的一年多赚187000美元。那么,在真实世界中,22.1赫兹是什么程度的呢?梅修表示可以拿詹姆斯-琼斯和麦克-泰森的声调做比较,然后取他们之间差异的六分之一来测算。
【嗓音的影响力:嗓音低沉 收入更多】相关文章:
★ 又到一年飞絮季 北京绘“杨柳地图” 力争到2020年改善
★ 这个售价650美元的“思考箱”在推特上火了!里面都有啥?
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15