“在我看来,把大量的老人和孩子关在屋子里——尤其是有残疾的儿童,然后用机器人陪着他们干这干那,而全球大量的人类则忙着找一份勉强糊口的工作,这其实比狄更斯笔下的机器工业化噩梦更可怕,比卡夫卡笔下冷漠、疏远的职场更可悲。”
“It’s an abdication of a desire to remain human, to be connected to each other through care, and to take care of each other.”
“这相当于放弃了对保持人性的渴望,放弃了通过关爱来彼此联系,放弃了互相照顾。”
Tufekci argues that based on unemployment figures, we’re not facing a shortage of caregivers. Rather, she writes, “we’re facing a shortage of caring.”
图菲克希认为,从失业数据来看,我们并非面临护工的短缺。相反,“我们面临的是缺乏关爱。”
Meanwhile, a new study from Pew Research suggests that tech industry influencers are split on whether robots will help or hurt the economy. Just over half of those surveyed believed robots won’t take away more jobs than they create, resulting in a net positive for the economy. However, the other half felt less optimistic about our robotic future.
与此同时,皮尤研究中心(Pew Research)的一项新研究显示,对科技行业有影响力的人们在机器人究竟会促进还是会损害国民经济的问题上持不同态度。约半数以上受访者认为,机器人抢走的工作不会比它们创造的工作多,因此会给经济带来正能量。另一半受访者则对与机器人共处的未来感到不太乐观。
【会笑会学习有礼貌 家用机器人Jibo】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15