这些数据虽然没有涉及真正的体育锻炼,对于真正从事锻炼的人来说却是个好消息。“我们的研究结果显示,有氧运动的好处不是安慰剂效应,”佛罗里达州立大学的认知心理学研究生卡里·斯托塔特(Cary Stothart)说。他牵头进行了这项研究。
If expectations had been driving the improvements in cognition seen in studies after exercise, Mr. Stothart said, then people should have expected walking to be more beneficial for thinking than stretching. They didn’t, implying that the changes in the brain and thinking after exercise are physiologically genuine.
斯托塔特解释,假如是人们的期待在驱动研究中发现的锻炼对认知能力的改善,那么受试者就应该是期待步行比拉伸更有益处。他们没有,这就意味着体育锻炼之后,大脑和思维能力真的发生了生理上的变化。
Of course, this study was small and involved a self-selected group of people who happen to like completing online surveys. Some said they exercised, others said they did not. None claimed to be familiar with the science related to exercise and the brain, but it is impossible to know if people were being forthright.
当然,这项研究的规模较小,参与者只涵盖了喜欢完成网上调查的人。有些人声称自己平时锻炼,其他人则说自己不运动。没人自称熟悉与运动和大脑有关的科学,但也无法知道他们是不是都说了真话。
【运动真的能让我们变聪明吗】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15