Since it's necessary to read, it's impossible to do without reading, but it's not the case. The name is different from the law. The law must be enforced. If you break the law, you will be punished by the law. Reading the name cannot be regulated in the form of law. So it is mandatory to say "must read". Most of the middle school students are not comfortable with these two words, and they are not willing to accept them. It is also a requirement to read the name. It is better to change the word, just like it is also a requirement not to trample on the lawn, "no trampling on the lawn, violators will be fined", which is not as effective as "please don't disturb, I am sleeping". The former is daunting, while the latter is kind and thought-provoking. To say "must read" is to say for not reading, but for some middle school students who are not famous for not reading, we should not kill them with one stick, and we should make specific analysis. I used to do the thankless things, open reading classes, and force students to read the classic articles of famous or famous scholars. Some students play hide and seek with you. He "practices the plank road and hides in the dark", put a name on it to cover your eyes, a star ambition or sports magazine on it, and do other homework secretly when you don't pay attention. You order They put away all the books that had nothing to do with the famous book, and they stared at the title of the famous book with a distracted eye, without turning a page in a class. Reading class like this, I think it's a very sad thing, not only failed to achieve the effect of reading famous and absorbing nourishment, but also wasted their precious time. I have talked with these students. They say they are not interested in these names and can't read them. So I reflect on myself: are we able to accept all the good things that we think are good? Conversely, are we able to accept all the good things that students think are good?
【名著“必读”还是“选读”】相关文章: