Animal experiments are not cruel. Agree or disagree?
Beginning:
Many years conservationists and animal rights groups- arguing that animal experiments are not cruel I agree/disagree following reasons:
Body:
Reason 1
agree: topic sentence: Animal experiments are justified to relieve human suffering论述:the reduction of human suffering is our first priority and the prevention of animal suffering or death is secondary to that . So that if there is a decent chance that an experiment will result in an important medical breakthrough that will reduce human suffering and death then it is justifiable to allow animal suffering. Animal experimentation is the ) means to much greater ends.
Digress: topic sentence: Animal experiments are cruel because of the animals suffering. Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves, not as the means to human ends; To infect monkeys with the AIDS virus or to expose rodents to toxic chemicals and radiation is simply not acceptable, whatever the supposed benefits.
Reason 2
agree topic sentence: to prevent animal suffering, in practice it is possible to keep animal suffering to an absolute minimum. Animal experimenters should aspire to the highest levels of animal welfare in their laboratories, using anaesthetics wherever possible and keeping animals in clean, comfortable, and healthy conditions. In short, it is possible to experiment on animals without being cruel to animals.
【雅思写作提纲:动物实验】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-19
2016-06-13
2016-06-13
2016-06-13
2016-06-13
2016-06-13