Even if one accepts the survey results, the argument remains questionable. 作了一下让步,开始攻击因果关系不成立。The argument assumes that the correlation between the use of SMILEBRIGHT and capped teeth means that SMILE BRIGHT causes the need for capped teeth. 这里就复述题目了,同时也是立起靶子,等待攻击。 But the argument fails to provide sufficient evidence to support the conclusion.指出没有证据显示有因果关系。先打拆开关系。
In addition, the argument fails to consider the possibility that people who already have capped teeth might prefer SMILEBRIGHT as a toothpaste because it works better on capped teeth.这里举出了个他因,甚至有点想逆转原来的因果关系的意思,从而使已经打拆开的因果关系分的更加清楚。
Finally, the arguments author fails to rule out alternative explanations.这里继续打拆上一段打开的因果关系,提出了他因,就像往伤口上撒一把盐。打个比方,女生家长为了不让女儿和一个男生在一起,就先把他两个给隔离起来,然后最狠的就是,给那个男生找一个巨棒巨棒的新女朋友。For instance, people who brush their teeth more than twice a day might be those who are prone to the need to have their teeth capped. 举出第一种可能性。Weak结论。 It might also be the case that starting with SMILEBRIGHT early in life damages the teeth so that capped teeth will be needed later.
【GRE写作argument全部官方范文分析(8)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01